Climate Policy

images of outdoor wilderness

Working Group

Climate policy will not be understood by most people through changes in the density of carbon molecules in the atmosphere or the source of the electrons in one’s circuits. Rather, it is the buildings, landscapes, and public works that stitch together everyday life where fights over climate adaptation and mitigation will be won or lost. As such, we view investments in the built and natural environment as a key instrument through which to imagine and construct the kinds of alternative futures made possible by a just energy transition and other redistributive climate policy frameworks.

This research topic focuses on questions of how the energy transition and the climate crisis will transform communities, landscapes, and the planet over the next century. Some of these questions are technological and scientific, with links to the deployment of clean energy systems, carbon capture and sequestration technologies (including trees), and the broader push to “electrify” and then decarbonize everything. But our primary concern is one of culture—how the climate crisis and our local, national, and global response to it might transform how and where we live and relate to one another. Whether through experiments with aesthetics, climate fiction and other modes of storytelling, scenario-based modeling and visualization, or other forms of testing or landing climate policy in real places in partnership with real constituencies, this work flows from a simple premise: that no one can or should understand climate change or the energy transition solely through the concentration of carbon molecules in the atmosphere or the source of the electrons in their circuits. Rather, they can and should comprehend it through the investments it makes possible in their everyday lives—through deep energy retrofits in their homes, through good-paying and dignified low-carbon jobs, through low-carbon transportation and recreation options, and through the broader, more quotidian infrastructures that stitch together everyday life.

Nicholas Pevzner’s research explores topics of urban ecology and its integration into landscape design, as well as energy infrastructure and its spatial impacts within the energy transition. Pevzner assembles interdisciplinary collaborations with colleagues in ecology, forestry, sociology, planning, architecture, cultural landscape studies, and energy policy.

Projects

map of usa showing locations of brownfields

Carbon Sinks on Abandoned Lands

Thousands of hazardous waste and abandoned sites are dotted throughout the U.S. landscape. They represent a significant remediation challenge, but also the potential of other ecological and community benefits. This research project considers abandoned land’s carbon storage potential, investigating the contribution that a beneficial reuse of the nation’s hazardous waste and abandoned sites for carbon storage could have, while visualizing the social and ecological benefits of such a strategy. It entails mapping and describing the variety of abandoned land typologies, research into remediation and afforestation strategies for these sites, and development of a Landscape Strategy Toolkit that explains their social, ecological, and carbon benefits.

map of usa with curved flight lines converging on various points

An Atlas for the Green New Deal

This atlas was conceived in relation to three intersecting issues. First, excess carbon in the atmosphere is changing the world’s climate: sea levels are rising, temperatures are increasing, and destructive weather events are becoming more frequent. Second, because it is our own systems of extraction, production, and consumption that are causing this climate crisis, an incremental approach to the future is not an option. Third, the US population is expected to grow by at least 100 million people this century, adding significantly to what is already the world’s mostconsumptive, high-carbon economy.

Taking on these challenges requires that we ask some big—and unsettling—questions. What will be lost—economically, culturally, psychologically, physically—should the climate crisis continue unabated? How can we begin to come together around a response to the crisis that will reshape how and where we live? How can we begin to think about investments in the built environment as a catalyst for the broader aims of decarbonization, adaptation, and social justice at a meaningfulscale?

collage of line art architectural images over a map of the world

Field Notes Toward An Internationalist Green New Deal

Field Notes toward an Internationalist Green New Deal is a project of the McHarg Center driven by graduate research assistants Palak Agrawal, Selina Cheah, Zane Cooper, Ian Dillon, A.L. McCullough, and Yixin Wei under the direction of Billy Fleming. Employing a variety of digital media, mapping, storytelling, and other methods, this project asks a series of critical questions about the international and justice dimensions of the Green New Deal. How might the buildout of clean energy infrastructure in the Global North reproduce exploitative relations to the Global South? How might the Green New Dealers seek to ameliorate concerns that their vision represents yet another a form of green imperialism or green capitalism? How might designers think differently about where and how they participate in the discourse around an energy transition, a just transition, and a Green New Deal? Field Notes intends to probe these questions through the development of a new website and digital storytelling platform aimed at making these complex power relations and material flows legible; thinking, drawing, and writing critically about the political economy of energy system and infrastructure production with which design is often complicit; and inviting external collaborators to add to our work, thickening and expanding our understanding of the Green New Deal’s international dimensions over the coming years. Think of it as part mapping and representational, part oral history andethnography, and part environmental humanities project rooted in questions of how and where landscape architecture fits within the next century of climate-driven action.